Florida Underinsured #auto, #accident, #insurance, #florida, #coverage, #personal, #injury, #protection, #brian, #labovick, #car, #vehicle, #medical,


#

Florida Underinsured / Uninsured Motorist Coverage Defined

Underinsured and uninsured motorist coverage protects drivers when the other driver either doesn’t have enough auto insurance or none at all. According to Brian LaBovick, of LaBovick LaBovick, an attorney in South Florida who specializes in auto accident cases, these are important coverages to have.

He explained, “Underinsured motorist coverage or uninsured motorist coverage (UM) is the flipside to bodily injury (BI) insurance. In other states, those two insurances are fairly different. They cover things differently, but in Florida, it’s pretty simple. We’ve simplified it and whether the person who hit you in your car is uninsured or simply underinsured (doesn’t have enough insurance), it won’t matter.”

“You can buy bodily injury insurance which will cover you if you hurt somebody else, but what happens to you if the person who hits you doesn’t have any bodily injury insurance and is fairly poor and can’t pay a judgment if (God forbid) they hurt you badly? If you need an operation, say a neck operation, and you don’t have health insurance and it’s going to cost $100,000, who’s going to pay for that?”

UM is good to have especially in Florida

LaBovick thinks that UM insurance is especially good to have in Florida as the state does not require motorists to carry bodily injury coverage. He continued, “You can have insurance that will cover you in case the person who hits you does not have that insurance and you can have the amount of it up to the amount that you buy bodily injury insurance. So, the flip side of bodily injury insurance is called uninsured or underinsured motorist insurance, commonly referred to as UM.”

“UM is a great insurance to have, especially in Florida as the person who hits you has no mandated need to have BI insurance, so they’re not going to be covering you. Even if you have BI, if you haven’t bought UM, you won’t be covered in any way, shape or form.”

Involved in a Florida car accident. Click here to contact a Florida car accident attorney.


Second dui offense #dane #county, #wi,owi, #dui, #dwi, #dwi, #dui, #drunk #driving, #procedure, #owi #treatment


#

This page is about the counting of alcohol offenses in Wisconsin when charging OWI / DUI / DWI cases. If you are looking for information about the DUI / OWI Treatment Court in Dane County, or court process for criminal DUI / OWI cases in Dane County you should go to those pages instead.

DUI / OWI (Drunk Driving) Math inWisconsin

Criminal Cases that depend on how you count

In Wisconsin all drunk driving charges after the first one are criminal charges handled in Circuit Court. First offense cases are not charged as crimes unless there is a minor in the car or there is an injury. Both criminal and civil drunk driving charges can have profound consequences. This page is about what counts and does not count as a prior conviction. It may surprise you.

Which things are counted as prior offenses is listed, confusingly, in Sec. 343.307, Wisconsin Statutes. Penalties (and classification as non-criminal/misdemeanor/felony) is determined by the penalty provisions in Sec. 346.65, Wisconsin Statutes .

Further, the timing and sequence of arrests and convictions can matter.

Civil Cases – First Offense

First Offense OWI / DUI is not treated as a crime in Wisconsin unless there is a child in the vehicle or someone is injured. That does not mean it is treated lightly. First offense OWI / DUI in Wisconsin often results in more significant penalties than in other states that treat this as a crime. However, the procedures are a little different in non-criminal cases and many different courts can hear such cases. If you have never been arrested or cited or in court for an OWI / DUI / Drunk Driving you are treated as a first offender. Except if as an underage drinker you were convicted of an absolute sobriety violation in another state that will count as a prior conviction.

Any one incident more than ten years ago will not count, but more than one will count. That is if a driver had one prior in May of 1989 a charge in June of 1999 (or 2010) counted as first offense. However if the driver had the May 1989 and the June 1999 offenses (both treated as first offenses) and then another in 2010, the 2010 charge would not be a first offense or second offense but a criminal third offense for court purposes. Again, you can have two first offenses more than ten years apart but not three. The look-back period for a any offense after the second is January 1, 1989. The look-back period to determine if a second actual offense is charged as a second offense is ten years, date of offense to date of offense.

No offenses before January 1, 1989 are counted.

Out of State Charges Are Different – Usually in a bad way!

The following are counted as prior convictions in Wisconsin when they occurred in a different state – even if they would not count in the original state:

  1. Refusing to take a chemical test
  2. A deferred prosecution for OWI / DUI / Drunk Driving / Drugged Driving that did not result in a conviction
  3. Operating as an underage drinker you were convicted of an absolute sobriety violation (would not count if in Wisconsin)
  4. A conviction for OWI / DUI / Drunk Driving / Drugged Driving

Some offenses in or out of Wisconsin are not counted!

Some prior convictions are not counted if proper procedures were not followed. This is a complex determination and requires analysis of all relevant records by an experienced attorney. For instance in one of the cases handled by our office a case originally charged as a third offense was properly revised to be a first offense.

Examples of counting

Example 1 – 3rd offense following two first offenses

Fifth Offense – Felony

Note, this is the same as example 6 except for the date of the second offense and conviction. The fourth offense conviction (third charged) was within 5 years of the second offense and the offense was within 5 years following the second offense conviction. The fourth charge was counted as a third because at the date of conviction there were only two earlier convictions. The third charge was counted as a fourth because at the date of conviction there were three convictions counted.

Example 8 – Out-of-state deferral without conviction

Note: State v. Carter . 2010 WI 132 (Dec. 2, 2010) decided saying that the Illinois absolute sobriety suspension counts as a prior offense. This does not necessarily apply to all out-of-state absolute sobriety convictions. Read the case!

IID Requirement (Ignition Interlock Device) – one more wrinkle on counting

Repeat Offenses

An IID is required for all second or subsequent offenses, even if the offense would be counted as a first offense for other penalty purposes. Village of Grafton v. Seatz . 2014 WI App 23 (Jan. 29, 2014). But, see DMV OWI Penalty Chart .

This is true even if none of the offenses involved alcohol. (No one ever said that the laws had to make sense.)

More Serious First Offenses

If there is an alcohol level of .15 or higher (at the time of the offense). Note: The alcohol reading on the evidentiary breath test may be higher than the alcohol level was at the time of the offense! Also, these machines are not calibrated to measure at the .15 level. Talk to a drunk driving defense lawyer!

If there was an unlawful refusal to take an evidentiary test that is specified in the Wisconsin Implied Consent law.

Can last longer than the revocation even if ordered for the same length of time – usually will last longer!

If an 18-month revocation period and an 18-month IID requirement are both imposed, do they end at the same time? Usually not. The revocation period gives credit for any period of administrative suspension (up to six months). In addition, the revocation period runs out once the time is up. The IID requirement does not start running until the driver has a license (occupational or regular).

Applies to all cars owned or driven, whether or not an owned car can even run!

If the DMV has record of the driver owning a vehicle, even if it has been junked or is undrivable, the driver will be required by the DMV to install an IID in it unless the vehicle is exempted by the Court.

Warning – Use at your own risk.

This page is not intended to be legal advice or substitute for legal advice. It is intended to provide general information. Legal advice can only be given with a full understanding of the actual facts of a case, generally in a face-to-face consultation. Note that there are exceptions to many of the statements made on this page. No one should act or refrain from acting based on anything stated in this web page. My office does not give legal advice to non-clients over the phone or internet. Further, the law (and procedures) in drunk driving cases are changing rapidly. This page reflects procedures in place in Wisconsin on January 1, 2014. In this session of the legislature, the Assembly has passed bills that would change many things stated on this page; those changes have not been adopted by the Senate, yet.

DUI / OWI Wisconsin – How this office approaches DUI / OWI cases. The need for an assessment and / or treatment along with competent legal assistance is discussed.

DUI / OWI Field Sobriety Tests in Wisconsin – A look at what field sobriety tests are – and are not – in Wisconsin.

DUI / OWI (Drunk Driving) Wisconsin Ten Day Warning – Why a defendant needs to take action before the court process even gets going.

DUI / OWI Treatment Court – an option that must be considered in Dane County for some third-offense cases

Wisconsin Judicial Sentencing Guidelines for OWI / DUI / Drunk Driving cases by County. Each judicial district has different guidelines.

Click on images above for larger view This page last revised: 09 Feb 2017 17:43:51 -0600.

Email Warning (links below)

By clicking on a button or link below you will be attempting to send an email to the office of Attorney Charles Kyle Kenyon. We do not give legal advice or opinions to non-clients over the phone, the Internet, or by email. Sending an email to us does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential information should not be sent by email. Do not expect that information sent us will be kept secret. If your email is about a legal matter please restrict your email to:

  1. Your name address and phone number.
  2. The County involved.
  3. A time when it would be convenient for someone from this office to contact you and set up a time for you to consult with an attorney.

Clicking on the button or link below means you have read the above and agree to keep any communication about legal matters within these limits.

Copyright 1997-2017 Charles Kyle Kenyon. Madison, Wisconsin, all rights reserved.

This is a living hypertext document. If you find any errors, of fact or in links, please contact me so that they may be corrected. Please also write to me for permission to copy. You can reach me at lawyer at Add Balance.

Note: NO email is sent from this domain. If you receive any email with a domain name of addbalance.com. it is spam and not from me!

The name of this file is duimath.htm.


Legal Services – Chesapeake, VA – Michael G # #michael #sweeney, #mike #sweeney, #attorney, #lawyer,


#

Legal Hope For Victims of Motor Vehicle Accidents and Personal Injuries

  • The United States Supreme Court, Washington D.C.
  • The United States Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Richmond, Virginia
  • The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, Richmond, Norfolk, Virginia
  • The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Elizabeth City, North Carolina
  • The Virginia Supreme Court, Richmond, Virginia
  • The Virginia Court of Appeals, Richmond, Virginia
  • All Circuit Courts in the Commonwealth of Virginia
  • All General District Courts in the Commonwealth of Virginia
  • The North Carolina Supreme Court, Raleigh, North Carolina
  • The North Carolina Court of Appeals, Raleigh, North Carolina
  • All Superior Courts in the State of North Carolina
  • All District Courts in the State of North Carolina

If you have been injured in an accident, our legal team will investigate your case and interview all witnesses. We will obtain all of your medical records, medical bills and we will obtain an affidavit of wage loss from your employer. Once we have obtained all information relevant to your case, we will submit a demand for compensation to the insurance company. If the insurance company fails to agree to a fair settlement with you, then we will file a lawsuit and represent you in Court. Our legal team will prepare your case for presentation to the Court and assist you at every stage of the lawsuit.

Call now and schedule an appointment to discuss your case. We offer free consultations for all personal injuries.

We are only paid if you receive compensation for your injury.

Experience you can trust, personal service you deserve.

Michael Sweeney has been practicing law in Virginia and North Carolina for over 23 years.

“I have the experience to help you with your legal needs. I am committed to providing you with the highest level of service. My number one goal is to provide my clients with the results they deserve and to provide them with my utmost personal attention. Every case is important to me.”

Disclaimer: The information contained in this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for legal advice regarding your specific situation.


Class Action #class #action,lawsuit #loans,settlement #funding,litigation #finance,class #action #lawsuit #funding,class #action #settlement #funding


#

Class Action

Class Action Lawsuit Funding

Class Action Litigation Finance

Are you a plaintiff in a class action lawsuit and need settlement funding to help your financial situation? If the answer is yes, USA Lawsuit Loans is the solution you’ve been looking for. USA Lawsuit Loans provides plaintiffs and attorneys with low interest class action lawsuit loans and fast class action lawsuit funding. Our class action settlement financing services are not based on your personal credit or work history but rather on the strengths and merits of your lawsuit. Most importantly, our lawsuit cash advances for class action lawsuits are non-recourse, this means you only repay your class action lawsuit loan if you win or settle case, and otherwise the money is simply yours to keep. You may receive your lawsuit cash advance within 24 hours after you have applied. The road to financial freedom starts here, so get your settlement loan by contacting USA Lawsuit Loans today at 866-840-4498 or by filling out our quick class action lawsuit funding online application .

Class Action Settlement Funding

Class Action Lawsuit Loans

In legislation, a class lawsuit. a class action. as well as a representative action is a type of lawsuit whereby a large number of individuals together bring a claim to court and/or where a class of defendants are sued. Class actions lawsuits are commonly known as “class action suits”. But yet the phrase “class action lawsuit” is redundant as the customary difference between suits at law and action in justness are not recognized anymore. These types of collective lawsuits were established in the US which happens to be nonetheless predominantly a US paradox. In spite of this, in a number of European nations with civil law, in contrast to the Anglo-American prevalent law system, have integrate adjustments in recent years that permit individual organizations to deliver claims with respect to significant groups of individuals. In conclusion a class action lawsuit is a suit formed on behalf of numerous similarly situated individuals who have been harmed in a similar fashion by the exact entity.

USA Lawsuit Loans is a lawsuit funding company that provides low interest lawsuit cash advances for plaintiffs of class action lawsuit throughout the United States. If you believed you have been wronged by a corporation via negligence of a company, manufacturer, or investment firm and are involved in the litigation process, a litigation loan from USA Lawsuit Loans may be of great value to help you sustain your financial obligations. There’s no set limit on how money you may borrow and we no restrictions on how you spend your class action lawsuit loan.

Why is class action lawsuit funding from USA Lawsuit Loans your best choice?

  • We’ve provided funding for some of the biggest class action lawsuits cases in the country
  • We guarantee the best rates
  • We offer non-recourse lawsuit funding. repay only if you win or settle your case
  • We work quickly to approve your lawsuit funds
  • Working funds to pay costly litigation
  • Money for purchasing a new vehicle
  • Money for your dream home

Legal Funding For Class Action Lawsuit

Class Action Litigation Financing

Class action law firms fight challenging lawsuits for their clients on a federal as well as a state level. Class action attorneys may initiate legal procedures many years away in advance of a possible settlement. Many companies will pay millions of dollars out of pocket in preparation expenditures and litigation. Class action lawsuits are the lengthiest particular lawsuits reference to timeframe in the process to acquire a settlement in the over-all legal sector. Such class action law firms that represent not simply one person but a significant group of people and/or businesses are at frequently unwilling to even consider a low ball settlement offers. The plaintiffs which have been unfavorably afflicted perhaps physically as well as economically ought to think of lawsuit settlement funding in an effort to overcome financial problems. Once you apply for a lawsuit cash advance, the money may be available in 48 hours or less, USA Lawsuit Loans is fast to approve your class action settlement funding .

Here are some class action lawsuits examples:

  • Renters and homeowners impacted by a toxic spill in their community.
  • Consumers who acquired the similar faulty merchandise or were injured by unfair profession practices made by a company.
  • Employees confronted with routine or unbiased behavior due to religious beliefs, age, and gender discrimination by their employer.
  • Patients giving prescriptions without disclosing, harmful side-effects.
  • Consumers and merchants who buy goods at inflated prices as a result of the anti-competitive actions of large companies.
  • Investors that might be victimized by scams with regards to the selling or buying of stocks along with securities.

Apply for Class Action Litigation Funding

Best Rates for Class Action Lawsuit Funding

If you are involved in a Class Action lawsuit and need legal financing to assist you with the high cost of litigation or to a help you keep your business up float, USA Lawsuit Loans is your answer. We provide legal funding at any stage of your Class Action lawsuit. USA Lawsuit Loans offers the lowest rates in the class action lawsuit financing industry and we work fast to approve your lawsuit loan request. Upon receiving the supporting documents for your Class Action lawsuit we can have you approved for Class Action funding in as little as 48 hours. Receive the lawsuit cash advance you need today by completing our fast and easy litigation funding online application or by calling USA Lawsuit Loans at 1-866-840-4498. We look forward to becoming your legal funding solution for your lawsuit funding and litigation financing needs. USA Lawsuit Loans is your one stop for all of your Class Action funding needs. We are ready to compete for your business and offer you the best rates for Class Action lawsuit funding .

Our Lawsuit Funding Types

Your Litigation Funding Options

USA Lawsuit Loans is a highly respected lawsuit funding company that cares about the their clients and hopes to provide financial stability for people going through the extensive court processes associated in a lawsuit. USA Lawsuit Loans in addition provides litigation funding for: Pre Settlement Funding, Post Settlement Funding, Structured Settlement Funding, Commercial Lawsuit Funding, and Law Firm Funding .

Class Action Settlement loans by States

Class Action Lawsuit Funding in Your State


Chicago, Illinois Nursing Home Abuse Lawyers – Ring Litigation P #chicago #nursing #home #abuse #lawyers,


#

Chicago Nursing Home Abuse Lawyers

Nursing Home Lawyers Serving all of Illinois

You and your family reach the wrenching conclusion that you have to put your loved one in a nursing home. Mom or Dad can no longer live by themselves safely. You ask your friends and colleagues what they know about nursing homes in Chicago. You go online and carefully read the descriptions about the facility and the staff of each nursing home you hear about. You want just the right place to care for your loved one so they are well cared for.

After much deliberation, you choose a nursing home. You help your loved one pack up the house and move into the home. You breathe a much-deserved sigh of relief and plan out your visits.

Everything is fine for a while. Your loved one is adjusting and beginning to talk about new friends. In fact, your loved one talks a lot about one new friend in particular, someone on the nursing home staff. But soon you begin to notice bruises on your loved one. The last time you visited, your loved one was incoherent and the check book was out on the table.

You begin to suspect something is not right.

Where can you turn?

Nursing home abuse and neglect is against the law

Federal and Illinois laws protect the elderly from abuse, mistreatment, and neglect in nursing homes or by caregivers in private homes. The law also dictates the process for reporting and investigating claims of abuse. A nursing home abuse lawyer in Chicago can provide you with sound legal advice with your family’s best interest in mind.

Trial lawyers who know how to get past the lies

At Ring Litigation P.C. our experienced trial lawyers know how to ferret out the facts. We know how to bring charges against those responsible for neglect and abuse, including theft. And as litigators, we are always prepared to take your suit to trial. We are particularly adept at cross-examination about events leading to abuse. We know how to identify the lies and get past them. We review nursing home records, reports, and testimonies in sworn statements and depositions. We poke for statements that make no sense, conflict with one another, and leave gaping holes.

We are committed to handling your case with the utmost compassion. As Chicago nursing home abuse lawyers. our primary goal is the safety of your loved one. That means holding those responsible for your loved one’s neglect or abuse accountable for their actions. We work relentlessly to see that your family receives the compensation you deserve as quickly as possible.

We can also handle arbitrations and appeals.

Get peace of mind

Ring Litigation P.C. can ably take your legal problems off your hands. We know how busy you are already. With a Ring Litigation P.C. Chicago nursing home attorney by your side to handle all the details, you can breathe a bit more easily and gain peace of mind.

Place your loved ones in a ring of care call Ring Litigation P.C.

For a nursing home lawyer in Chicago, rely on the trial attorneys of Ring Litigation P.C. Call us today at 312.781.0290 or contact us online to schedule your free initial consultation and receive your free nursing home checklist. Hablamos espa ol. Parliamo italiano.


International Law Firm in San Francisco #law #firm,legal #services,attorneys,international,business,industry,litigation,investigations,transactions,counseling,regulatory #matters,pro #bono,amlaw


#

North America

Overview

Winston Strawn s San Francisco office is home to more than 115 attorneys and professional staff. Located in the center of the city s financial district, the office provides stunning views from the Golden Gate Bridge to the rolling hills of the East Bay. With Silicon Valley just down the road and the city s technology industry growing, our San Francisco office sits at the heart of California s high-tech corridor.

Created as a result of the firm s 2003 merger with Murphy Sheneman Julian Rogers, our San Francisco office opened with a notable team of restructuring, corporate lending, private equity, and commercial litigation attorneys. Over the past decade, we have quickly grown our Bay Area presence to offer services to clients in a number of other areas, including the energy and financial services sectors, and experience in antitrust, white collar defense, intellectual property, state and local tax controversy, and labor and employment. Our strong litigation practice recently expanded to include capabilities to assist clients on compliance and enforcement matters arising under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other countries anti-bribery laws.

With a culture that represents the Bay Area s innovative spirit, our attorneys are regularly honored with high-profile awards and frequently recognized by publications, such as Chambers USA. The American Lawyer. the Daily Journal. and The Recorder .

Directions

Professionals

Load More Professionals

View All Professionals

News, Events, Publications

Market Highs and Political Lows–Capital Raising in a Post-Factual World 06/28/17

Financial Services Update, Vol. 12, Issue 23 06/12/17

NYC Mayor Signs New York City’s “Fair Work Week” Legislation June 8, 2017

Winston Strawn Recognized in 2017 IAM Patent 1000 Rankings 06/08/17

Labor News – May 2017 May 2017

The “Do’s And Don’ts” of Drafting Arbitration Clauses When Doing Business with Chinese Parties 06/07/17

Financial Services Update, Vol. 12, Issue 22 06/05/17

Winston Strawn Recognized in The Legal 500 U.S. 2017 Edition 05/31/17

Supreme Court Holds That Patent Exhaustion Applies to All Sales, Foreign and Domestic 05/31/17

Privacy Law News – May 2017 May 2017

California DFEH Releases Workplace Harassment Guidance for California Employers 05/30/17

Review of Voluntary CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure Yields Mixed Results 05/30/17

Winston Strawn Recognized by Chambers USA 2017 05/26/17

Focus on Tax Controversy – May 2017 May 2017

New Criminal and Civil Risks Posed By No-Poach and Wage Agreements 05/24/17

Trump Administration Officially Initiates the Renegotiation of the North America Free Trade Agreement 05/23/17

Supreme Court Reverses Broad Interpretation Of Residence For Venue In Patent Cases 05/23/17

Financial Services Update, Vol. 12, Issue 21 05/22/17

Forum for Financial Institution Directors: The Current M A Environment 05/19/17

Financial Services Update, Vol. 12, Issue 20 05/15/17

Financial Services Update, Vol. 12, Issue 19 05/08/17

Winston Strawn Shortlisted for Chambers Women in Law Awards USA 2017 05/08/17

New York City Bans Salary History Inquiries 05/08/17

Labor News – April 2017 April 2017

Financial Services Update, Vol. 12, Issue 18 05/01/17

Federal Circuit Patent Decision Summaries – April 2017 April 2017

Washington, D.C. Act Prohibiting Use of Credit History in Employment Decisions Now Effective 04/27/17

Privacy Law News – April 2017 April 2017

Improve Compliance Programs to Avoid Government Investigations 04/24/17

Financial Services Update, Vol. 12, Issue 17 04/24/17

California FEHC Further Limits Employers’ Use of Criminal History 04/20/17

Winston Pro Bono Team Overturns Client’s Death Penalty 04/19/17

News From North America

Liisa Thomas Presents Data Breach Simulation at IAPP Conference 10/16/17

Market Highs and Political Lows–Capital Raising in a Post-Factual World 06/28/17

Amanda Groves Explores Class Actions Trends Impacting the Dietary Supplement Industry 06/27/17

Fostering Productive Relationships, Securing Positive Press Coverage, and Staying Within the Ethical Rules in High-Profile Cases 06/15/17

Health Care Private Equity Discussion 06/14/17


Uncontested Divorce – DIY Forms #court, #courts, #new #york, #new #york #state, #new #york #city,


#

Uncontested Divorce Program

Aviso: Este programa es en ingl s, pero obtendr su traducci n al pulsar sobre ESPA OL. Deber responder en ingl s o el tribunal rechazar sus documentos.

An “uncontested” divorce is where both you and the person you want to divorce agree to divorce and there is an agreement about what will happen to your finances and property after the divorce. [Learn more about Divorce ]

You can use this program if:

  • You and the person you want to divorce are over 18 years of age,
  • You and the person you want to divorce have no “children” under 21 years of age ,
  • Your marriage has been over for at least 6 months and your relationship can’t be saved, AND
  • All marital property issues, including debt, have been settled.

Information Checklist

You will need the following information with you when you use this program:

  • The name, previous last names (if any), current address, social security number, and phone number of the person you want to divorce.
  • A copy of your marriage certificate.
  • If you have any of the following: Settlement Agreement, Order of Protection, etc.
  • If you have an extreme financial hardship and can’t afford the court fees: information about your income, the things you own, and how much you spend a month on utilities and rent.

Download and print the checklist of information you will need to complete this program.

Start

Note: You will be taken to our partner website called LawHelp Interactive.

You can Sign Up to Save Your Work or go directly to the program without signing up by clicking on Get Started or Go . Then check to agree to the Terms of Use and click on Continue to begin the program.

About DIY Forms

Who Can Use These Programs?
You can use DIY Forms if:

  • you’re a court user and you don’t have a lawyer;
  • you’re a legal services provider;
  • you’re a pro bono lawyer. Pro bono lawyers filing a DIY Form must submit thispro bono affirmation .
  • you’re from a low-bono (reduced fee) program recognized and authorized to use the DIY Form programs by the NYS Courts Access to Justice Program. You must submit this low-bono affirmation with the filing.

Commercial use is prohibited and no one may charge for using these programs. When you begin the program, you will be asked to accept these terms of use.

Computer Requirements
In order to use DIY Form programs, make sure you have the following:

Note: If you’re on a Mac and do not have Microsoft Word, this program will not work for you.

Help Using DIY Forms
See Frequently Asked Questions for help using DIY Form programs.

Related Information:


23 Years of Herpes Lawsuits – Do You Have to Tell You Have Herpes and


23 Years of Herpes Lawsuits Do You Have to Tell You Have Herpes and When?

You CAN be sued for not telling someone you had herpes. 23 years of herpes lawsuits proves this.

Starting in 1987, Let’s Look Over 23 Years of Herpes Lawsuits

In 1987 Tony Bennett made headlines when he was ordered by the courts to undergo medical tests to determine if he could have given a woman genital herpes. Bennett said he didn’t have herpes and that his doctors report confirmed this. Her lawsuit was for $95 million and he, naturally, was counter suing for $100 million.

I can find many references to the filing of this case, and none to how it was eventfully settled .

Also in 1987, this was making headlines:

The decision upheld the right of Jane Maharam, 56, to sue her former husband Robert, 56, on her claim that he had herpes and did not tell her. The court found that such partners have a legal duty to inform each other about their venereal diseases.

1992 was another big year in herpes lawsuits:

One of the big news items was that a 1986 lawsuit filed again the actor/comedian Robin Williams was finally settled. That’s 6 years later after the herpes lawsuit was filed! The case was settled out of court for an “undisclosed sum.”

The 1992 article in The New York Times, “Pillow Talk ” brings up much that is still hotly being debated today:

1. Mr. Williams s lawyer, argued in court papers that a person who doesn t ask and doesn t insist on prophylactics should assume the risks.

2. So, legal experts have begun to ask whether the responsibility for taking precautions should be shared. Everybody should be on notice that unprotected sex creates risks of all sorts, and you shouldn t rely totally on the good-faith disclosure of a partner, said Catherine O Neill of the Legal Action Center.

3. He also noted that judges have not come right out and described what they would consider a legally acceptable way to break the bad news to a lover. They haven t exactly spelled out a kind of Miranda warning for these cases, Mr. Rabin said.

4. In herpes litigation, the claims against partners have ranged from those who sinned by omission, keeping mum about their status, to those who, when asked if they had a sexually transmitted disease, lied. In a 1984 opinion in a herpes case, a California appellate court acknowledged that while rulings on bedroom behavior infringed the right to privacy, public-health-policy concerns loomed larger. Courts have decided that if someone is infected, aware of it and sexually active, that person has a duty to inform a partner, who by extension, has a right to know.

2004 Herpes Lawsuits

In 2004 it was alleged NOT that Liza Minnelli had actually given David Gest herpes, but that Liza Minnelli had not told him that she had herpes until months after they had been married. Essentially, what was put forth was that this would make the prenuptial agreement invalid as the agreement would have been based on fraud… not all the information was given to Gest when signing the prenup.

2006 Herpes Lawsuit

Michael Vick, the football player who was later went to jail for dog-fighting and animal cruelty, settled a lawsuit filed by a woman who said he knowingly gave her herpes. The name “Ron Mexico” became infamous as that was the fake name Vick is reported to have used when seeking treatment for herpes.

2007 Herpes Lawsuit

In Los Angeles CA, Elizabeth Mazzocchi filed a herpes lawsuit against NYPD Blue actor Esai Morales. Once again, you only can find reference to the announcement of the lawsuit, and no reference to its outcome .

2009 Herpes Lawsuit

A woman was awarded $7 million in a suit filed by a 56 year old woman who was infected with herpes by a 77 year old man. Interesting here is the woman said she was denied health insurance after getting infected with herpes. The77 year old man said he would appeal.

2010 Herpes Lawsuit

A woman from Chicago filed a herpes lawsuit seeking $50,000 against her husband. The 1987 Tony Bennett lawsuit was for $95 million. Now, lawyers will take cases for $50,000. It seems it’s getting easier and easier to sue for herpes.

Where there is blood in the water, you are sure to find sharks. Lawyers seem to be more actively chasing the herpes ambulance.

WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD FOR HERPES LAWSUITS?

MORE HERPES QUESTIONS THAT LAWSUITS MAY DECIDE:
• Is there a double standard for oral herpes and genital herpes? Is this fair?

• Should people have to disclose that they have oral herpes before kissing another person?

• Can you be sued for having HSV-1 (usually oral herpes) and having oral sex, and not telling the other person?

• If you give a person HSV-1 through oral sex can you be sued?

• Can you be sued for KISSING another person and giving them HSV-1 oral herpes?

• Do you have to tell that you have genital herpes if you practice safe sex and it’s a one night stand?

• If you are participating in RISKY BEHAVIOR, does that mean you assume the risk? (Could a prostitute sue someone for giving her herpes?)

• Do porn stars have a right to know if the person they are working with has herpes?

• Must you tell the truth of your STD status if the other person asks? In other words, “Is LYING the same as simply not telling?”

• Is the responsibility of discussing herpes and other STDs a one way street? Is only a person who knows they have or have had an STD required to bring it up?

• Is a person who has unprotected sex with lots of people required to be truthful about this when asked? After all, it’s the risky behavior that makes a STD more likely. People that get tested are simply being responsible. Must the responsible people bear all the responsibility simply because they got tested?

• Does a person have a LEGAL responsibility to know their STD status? If a person is having unprotected sex with multiple partners, shouldn’t they know that they may be passing on STDs to other people, even if they haven’t received an official test? A reasonable person would know this.

• Is a person who has a STD but fails to get tested still legally responsible for giving the other person their STD? (The ignorance is bliss excuse is an excuse…)

• Is HSV-1 a sexually transmitted disease?

61 Comments


Whistleblower Litigation Due to Health Care Fraud on the Rise #whistleblower #litigation


#

Whistleblower Litigation Due to Health Care Fraud on the Rise

With millions of Americans insured through Medicare, Medicaid or other government programs, health care is an increasingly tempting area for fraud. Fraudulent claims for health care services cost the government billions of dollars every year, and is a major reason for the increase in health care costs in the U.S.

The government prosecutes those who commit health care fraud under the False Claims Act and the U.S. Department of Justice operates a Medicare Fraud Strike Force to search out and prosecute individuals accused of health care fraud. Texas also has its version of the False Claims Act, known as the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act.

The FCA has provisions that protect whistleblowers — individuals who report health care fraud crimes — and allow those whistleblowers to sue individuals or institutions that engage in health care fraud on behalf of the government. This is known as a qui tam lawsuit. Whistleblowers are eligible to receive a portion — typically between 15-25% — of any recovered funds.

Whistleblowers are protected by the FCA against being fired, demoted, suspended or threatened by employers as a result of filing an FCA complaint. If an employer is found to have retaliated against a whistleblower, they may be liable for back pay, interest and any other compensation due as a result of damage or loss the whistleblower may have suffered as a result of filing an FCA claim.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, there was more than $3.5 billion in settlements and judgments obtained against individuals and companies for health care fraud in 2015. Whistleblowers were awarded a total of $597 million in claims.

Qui tam litigation is a highly technical, complex area of the law. If you are considering filing a qui tam action, you should choose an attorney with the experience and resources to see your case through to the end.

If you or a loved one has suffered an injury or injustice, the experienced personal injury legal team at Roberts Roberts is here to help with compassionate, aggressive representation. Please call 800-248-6000 or contact us for a free consultation.

Do I Have a Case?