Connecticut Class Action Attorneys, Class Action Lawsuits Lawyer CT, Class Action Litigation, astrazeneca seroquel lawsuit.#Astrazeneca #seroquel #lawsuit


Connecticut Class Action Lawyers

Class action lawsuits involve an individual or small group who file a claim as representatives of a larger group. For more than 30 years, Koskoff has been actively involved in representing plaintiffs in class action cases here and in other states.

The firm was instrumental in reaching a $90 million settlement of a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of victims of the Colonial Realty pension plan Ponzi scheme against a major accounting firm.

A History of Success in Class Action Lawsuits

We have handled other class action cases on behalf of women harmed by dangerous breast implants; cancer victims of the drug DES; minorities excluded from police and fire departments due to discriminatory hiring; targets of illegal State Police wiretapping; victims of stock fraud, financial scams and corporate greed; consumers bilked by price-fixing activities; vacationers burned in a tragic fire in Puerto Rico; investors charged excessive and undisclosed fees; and state employees who were victims of sexual harassment, retaliation and a hostile work environment.

Class Action Lawsuits Attorney

Cases recently or currently being handled by our attorneys include:

  • Various claims against numerous multi-state retail establishments that illegally charge unwarranted sales taxes
  • A class action on behalf of 2,000 female employees of the Connecticut Department of Correction
  • Cases against various states requesting the reallocation of money derived from tobacco lawsuits to Medicaid recipients
  • Cases against mutual fund providers charging undisclosed fees in violation of ERISA
  • An anti-trust action against Visa and MasterCard for the way they set the fees they charge retail establishments.

Class Action Litigation

In every area of our practice, we assess whether a specific case may have broader implications that may merit class action litigation. Whether you are an individual who has been harmed or a lawyer seeking a law firm with the experience and resources to handle class action litigation, please contact us to discuss your case. From offices in Bridgeport, Danbury and New Haven, Connecticut, our firm represents clients in class actions in Connecticut and throughout the nation.

Class Action #class #action,lawsuit #loans,settlement #funding,litigation #finance,class #action #lawsuit #funding,class #action #settlement #funding


Class Action

Class Action Lawsuit Funding

Class Action Litigation Finance

Are you a plaintiff in a class action lawsuit and need settlement funding to help your financial situation? If the answer is yes, USA Lawsuit Loans is the solution you’ve been looking for. USA Lawsuit Loans provides plaintiffs and attorneys with low interest class action lawsuit loans and fast class action lawsuit funding. Our class action settlement financing services are not based on your personal credit or work history but rather on the strengths and merits of your lawsuit. Most importantly, our lawsuit cash advances for class action lawsuits are non-recourse, this means you only repay your class action lawsuit loan if you win or settle case, and otherwise the money is simply yours to keep. You may receive your lawsuit cash advance within 24 hours after you have applied. The road to financial freedom starts here, so get your settlement loan by contacting USA Lawsuit Loans today at 866-840-4498 or by filling out our quick class action lawsuit funding online application .

Class Action Settlement Funding

Class Action Lawsuit Loans

In legislation, a class lawsuit. a class action. as well as a representative action is a type of lawsuit whereby a large number of individuals together bring a claim to court and/or where a class of defendants are sued. Class actions lawsuits are commonly known as “class action suits”. But yet the phrase “class action lawsuit” is redundant as the customary difference between suits at law and action in justness are not recognized anymore. These types of collective lawsuits were established in the US which happens to be nonetheless predominantly a US paradox. In spite of this, in a number of European nations with civil law, in contrast to the Anglo-American prevalent law system, have integrate adjustments in recent years that permit individual organizations to deliver claims with respect to significant groups of individuals. In conclusion a class action lawsuit is a suit formed on behalf of numerous similarly situated individuals who have been harmed in a similar fashion by the exact entity.

USA Lawsuit Loans is a lawsuit funding company that provides low interest lawsuit cash advances for plaintiffs of class action lawsuit throughout the United States. If you believed you have been wronged by a corporation via negligence of a company, manufacturer, or investment firm and are involved in the litigation process, a litigation loan from USA Lawsuit Loans may be of great value to help you sustain your financial obligations. There’s no set limit on how money you may borrow and we no restrictions on how you spend your class action lawsuit loan.

Why is class action lawsuit funding from USA Lawsuit Loans your best choice?

  • We’ve provided funding for some of the biggest class action lawsuits cases in the country
  • We guarantee the best rates
  • We offer non-recourse lawsuit funding. repay only if you win or settle your case
  • We work quickly to approve your lawsuit funds
  • Working funds to pay costly litigation
  • Money for purchasing a new vehicle
  • Money for your dream home

Legal Funding For Class Action Lawsuit

Class Action Litigation Financing

Class action law firms fight challenging lawsuits for their clients on a federal as well as a state level. Class action attorneys may initiate legal procedures many years away in advance of a possible settlement. Many companies will pay millions of dollars out of pocket in preparation expenditures and litigation. Class action lawsuits are the lengthiest particular lawsuits reference to timeframe in the process to acquire a settlement in the over-all legal sector. Such class action law firms that represent not simply one person but a significant group of people and/or businesses are at frequently unwilling to even consider a low ball settlement offers. The plaintiffs which have been unfavorably afflicted perhaps physically as well as economically ought to think of lawsuit settlement funding in an effort to overcome financial problems. Once you apply for a lawsuit cash advance, the money may be available in 48 hours or less, USA Lawsuit Loans is fast to approve your class action settlement funding .

Here are some class action lawsuits examples:

  • Renters and homeowners impacted by a toxic spill in their community.
  • Consumers who acquired the similar faulty merchandise or were injured by unfair profession practices made by a company.
  • Employees confronted with routine or unbiased behavior due to religious beliefs, age, and gender discrimination by their employer.
  • Patients giving prescriptions without disclosing, harmful side-effects.
  • Consumers and merchants who buy goods at inflated prices as a result of the anti-competitive actions of large companies.
  • Investors that might be victimized by scams with regards to the selling or buying of stocks along with securities.

Apply for Class Action Litigation Funding

Best Rates for Class Action Lawsuit Funding

If you are involved in a Class Action lawsuit and need legal financing to assist you with the high cost of litigation or to a help you keep your business up float, USA Lawsuit Loans is your answer. We provide legal funding at any stage of your Class Action lawsuit. USA Lawsuit Loans offers the lowest rates in the class action lawsuit financing industry and we work fast to approve your lawsuit loan request. Upon receiving the supporting documents for your Class Action lawsuit we can have you approved for Class Action funding in as little as 48 hours. Receive the lawsuit cash advance you need today by completing our fast and easy litigation funding online application or by calling USA Lawsuit Loans at 1-866-840-4498. We look forward to becoming your legal funding solution for your lawsuit funding and litigation financing needs. USA Lawsuit Loans is your one stop for all of your Class Action funding needs. We are ready to compete for your business and offer you the best rates for Class Action lawsuit funding .

Our Lawsuit Funding Types

Your Litigation Funding Options

USA Lawsuit Loans is a highly respected lawsuit funding company that cares about the their clients and hopes to provide financial stability for people going through the extensive court processes associated in a lawsuit. USA Lawsuit Loans in addition provides litigation funding for: Pre Settlement Funding, Post Settlement Funding, Structured Settlement Funding, Commercial Lawsuit Funding, and Law Firm Funding .

Class Action Settlement loans by States

Class Action Lawsuit Funding in Your State

Florida Foreclosure Statutes of Limitations #florida #lawsuit #loans


Florida Foreclosure Statutes of Limitations

Florida law sets deadlines by which creditors, including mortgage holders, must file suit to collect their debts and foreclose on property. If a mortgage lender misses the deadline, it may never be able to enforce the debt. If you have not been able to make your mortgage payments and your mortgage lender or holder has not filed a foreclosure action as quickly as you expected, you should find out how much time it has to bring a foreclosure lawsuit.

What Are Statutes of Limitations?

The laws that set deadlines for lawsuits to be filed are called statutes of limitations. Different deadlines are set for different types of lawsuits. And statutes of limitations vary by state.

If a creditor files a lawsuit against you after the time period has run, you can defend the suit by asserting the statute of limitations. The expiration of the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense to a lawsuit. This means that even if you admit that you owe the money that the creditor is suing to collect, if the statute has expired, you can prevent a judgment from being entered against you by responding and claiming that the suit is barred by the statute of limitations.

Florida Mortgage Foreclosures Deficiency Judgments

In Florida, a mortgage holder can only foreclose on real estate by bringing a lawsuit. (In some other states, mortgage lenders can bring nonjudicial foreclosures — which means they don’t have to sue in court.) (Learn the difference between judicial and nonjudicial foreclosure .)

When the mortgage holder obtains a judgment of foreclosure, your mortgaged property is sold by the court at a foreclosure sale. If the sale does not bring in enough money to pay the entire amount of judgment, the mortgage holder can ask the court to enter a deficiency judgment against you for the difference between the foreclosure judgment amount and the value of the property. Sometimes this is done as part of the foreclosure lawsuit, but not always. Under Florida law, a mortgage holder can also obtain a deficiency judgment by filing a separate lawsuit against you. (For more information, see Summary of Florida’s Foreclosure Laws .)

The Time Limitation for Foreclosure in Florida

It is easy to look up how much time the statute of limitations gives a mortgage holder to foreclose in Florida (five years), but it gets tricky when you try to figure out when that time period starts and ends.

Five year deadline. Mortgage holders have five years to bring a lawsuit for foreclosure in Florida.

The time period begins to run from the date of default. Generally, it runs continuously but if you take action that prevents the mortgage holder from filing a foreclosure action, such as filing for bankruptcy, the time period may be tolled (suspended) or extended until the mortgage holder can legally take action again.

What Is the Date of Default?

Default is defined in your mortgage loan documents. Usually, it is defined as failing to make your payments when they come due or to bring them current within a certain grace period. But if you have missed several payments, which is the default date? The answer is that they probably all are. Each time you miss a mortgage payment, you are likely defaulting on your obligation under the note and mortgage.

When Does the Time Begin to Run?

Unless you have cured any of the defaults by making the payment due for that period, the mortgage holder can generally bring a foreclosure action based on any of the default dates. The only requirement is that the foreclosure suit must be filed within five years from the date the mortgage holder is using as the default date. Each time you miss a payment, a different time period begins to run. The mortgage holder can generally act on any of them.

This means that ultimately, your mortgage holder has five years from the date the final payment is due to bring a foreclosure action in Florida.

A Different Starting Point for Deficiency Judgments

In Florida, the statute of limitations for deficiency judgments resulting from foreclosures on or after July 1, 2013, is one year. The time period does not begin to run until the day after the court clerk issues a certificate of title to the buyer in the foreclosure sale. This is because your mortgage holder does not become entitled to a deficiency judgment in connection with a foreclosure until a judgment has been entered and your property has been sold for less than what was owed. If the foreclosure sale occurred before July 1, 2013, the statute is the earlier of five years or July 1, 2014.

Talk to a Foreclosure attorney.

Six key pieces of the approved Flint water lawsuit settlement #loans #on #lawsuit #settlement


Six key pieces of the approved Flint water lawsuit settlement

Judge approves settlement of Flint water crisis civil lawsuit

U.S. District Judge David M. Lawson on Tuesday, March 28, approved a settlement agreement in a civil lawsuit filed the Concerned Pastors for Social Action and others against the state of Michigan, City of Flint and others over the Flint water crisis.

The settlement guarantees replacement of 18,000 lead and galvanized service lines in Flint but not the door-to-door water deliveries that had been sought while that work is done.

The agreement was approved by the Flint City Council last week and the Flint Receivership Transition Advisory Board on Monday, March 27.

Erin Kirkland | The Flint Journal file photo

Service line replacements

The settlement legally binds Flint and Michigan to carry out some of the plans the city and state have committed to previously.

The settlement requires the state to allocate $87 million to pay for the replacement of lead and galvanized water service lines — at least $47 million of which must come from sources other than those approved by Congress and President Barack Obama last year.

It also requires that the state set aside an additional $10 million in reserves from federal funds to pay the cost of service line replacements in the event that the work costs more than expected.

Households with an active water account qualify for service line replacement.

The city and the state are required to ensure that at each household where a service line is replaced, residents are instructed to use filtered water for at least 6 months following the replacement.

Flint Journal file photo

New water monitoring requirements

Water monitoring requirements are included in the settlement deal, including a commitment from the state to test water in homes before and after service line replacements and the appointment of a third-party monitor to test the water in a minimum of 100 homes for at least three years.

The state must create its own program called Confirming Lead Elimination with Service Line Replacements to carry out the sampling in 100 homes before and after service line replacement.

The third-party monitor must be agreed to by plaintiffs and defendants in the water lawsuit. The 100 sites sampled by the monitor for three years will be separate from the routine testing done to maintain compliance with the federal Lead and Copper Rule. file photo

Changes ahead for bottled water distribution

The settlement requires the state to continue to operate at least nine community water resources sites at their current hours of operation and to make filters, filter cartridges, bottled water and water testing kits available to residents free of charge.

But beginning May 1, 2017, the state may close up to three distribution points. If more than three resource sites have an average number of daily water pickups of less than 20, the state may close only the three sites with the lowest average pick-up numbers.

From June until July, the state may close up to two additional points of distribution.

If the 90th percentile lead level of water tested from January until July is below the federal action level of 15 parts per billion, the state may close the remaining water distribution points but must maintain at least two until Sept. 1.

The state is not required to deliver water door-to-door as the lawsuit initially sought under some circumstances but residents may request water delivery by calling 211.

Even the 211 water deliveries can be discontinued by the state of lead if the 90th percentile lead level of water tested from January until July is below the federal action level of 15 ppb.

Danny Miller | The Flint Journal file photo

Commitment to CORE program

The agreement calls for the state to maintain and expand the Community Outreach and Resident Education program for filter education, installation and maintenance.

“State parties shall ensure that CORE teams are dispersed throughout Flint for eight hours per day, Monday through Saturday” and “will make a good-faith effort to maintain 160 education specialists, including 16 coordinators” as part of the CORE staff.

Before any permanent decrease in CORE staff, the state must provide written notice at least 30 days in advance.

The state will provide $100,000 to fund efforts to publicize the CORE program.

Mac Snyder | The Flint Journal file photo

Slip and Fall Settlement Amounts #slip #and #fall #settlement #amounts, #slip,fall,accident,injury,settlement,slippery,negligence,premises #liability,lawsuit,recovery,lawyer,attorney


Slip and Fall Settlement Amounts

Locate a Local Personal Injury Lawyer

What Is a Slip and Fall Accident?

Slip and fall accidents occur when a person falls and sustains an injury while on premises that are owned by another party. These are common in business establishments such as retail stores, shopping malls, and grocery stores. They may also occur in other settings like at the workplace or while on rented property. Slip and fall injuries are common where the flooring of the area is constantly under slick or slippery conditions.

What Are Slip and Fall Settlements?

A slip and fall settlement is where the injured party attempts to hold the responsible party liable for their losses or expenses caused by the accident. During the settlement negotiations, the parties will determine how much is owed, if anything, and whether further measures need to be taken (such as repairing or cleaning the floors).

Slip and fall settlements may be conducted in connection with a lawsuit based on negligence or premises liability. The settlement may be a result of the natural progression of the case. For example, the parties may decide early on that continuing with litigation would be too costly or too risky. As a result, they may resort to a settlement in order to avoid the costs associated with a lawsuit.

More commonly, slip and fall settlements are negotiated out-of-court even before a lawsuit is filed. For example, the injured party may approach the owner of the premises and inform them of their injury and resulting losses. Out of court settlements are common for minor claims and in instances where the owner of the premises is clearly at fault.

How Much Can I Recover in a Settlement?

It is difficult to say how much a person can recover in a slip and fall settlement. The amount of recovery is based on different factors, which may be different for each individual case. Settlements in a slip and fall case will depend on:

  • The type of injury: More serious injuries will of course result in a higher payout. Less serious injuries or injuries that were pre-existing will result in a lower recovery amount. Medical documentation may be needed as proof of the harm
  • Effects of the injury: The injured person may be entitled to losses that result from the injury, such as lost wages or impaired bodily function in the future
  • Degree of fault: If the injured party is partially or fully to blame for their injuries, their recovery may be reduced or even denied. For example, the victim may have acted recklessly by disregarding warning signs.
  • Relationship between the parties: Recovery may depend on the relationship between the parties, such as customer-patron, employer-employee, or landlord-tenant. Recovery may also depend on where the accident occurred (i.e. at work vs. at home)
  • Interactions with insurance companies: If the injured party has already received compensation from an outside source such as an insurance company, it may limit their amount of recovery (this may vary by jurisdiction). Also, if the injured party has delayed in filing an insurance claim, it may also reflect negatively on the outcome of the settlement.

Finally, it is somewhat common for the defendant in a slip and fall case to refuse to participate in settlement negotiations. This is especially true if they feel that they are not responsible for the slip and fall incident.

Should I Hire a Lawyer for Help with a Slip and Fall Settlement?

Many people feel that they can handle a slip and fall settlement on their own. However, it is advisable to work with a personal injury lawyer if you will be engaging in negotiations for a slip and fall settlement. Personal injury laws may vary widely according to state and local jurisdiction.

Your attorney can help present your arguments in a way that is both professional and efficient. In any slip and fall case, proving who is at fault is the most important thing. An experienced lawyer will be able to establish whether dangerous floor conditions were the cause of your injuries. Also, a lawyer will help you organize documents, photos, witness testimony, and other evidence that will support your claim.

Link to this page

Get a FREE Case Review – Pittsburgh Car Accident Attorneys #car #accident,auto #accident,car #crash,car #wreck,attorney,lawyer,pittsburgh,pennsylvania,lawsuit,injury


Car Accident Injury Attorneys

When you’re in a car accident, life becomes overwhelming – especially if you were hurt. You might be in pain, you might miss work, you might wonder, “How will I ever handle this?”

But you don’t have to handle it – we can do that for you. You work on getting better, and we’ll work on getting what you deserve after your accident.

Be Careful What You Say & Sign

Whether or not you were injured in a car accident, an insurance adjuster will likely reach out to you. Knowing how to handle them can help protect your legal rights. Our advice?

Don’t say or sign anything!

Talk to an attorney first. The insurance company wants to trip you up, hoping you’ll confuse the details of your story. They’ll use this against you later to deny your claim and leave you with the bill. Protect yourself. Just say, “No.” It’s your legal right.

What Caused Your Car Accident?

Did a distracted driver, poorly maintained road, or anything in between lead to your car accident injury? If your accident was caused by someone else’s mistake, you could be entitled to compensation for your injuries, missed time at work, and more.

Awards Memberships

Copyright 2002-2017. is sponsored by the Law Offices of Edgar Snyder Associates , A Law Firm Representing Injured People. Attorney Edgar Snyder Associates has offices throughout Western Pennsylvania including locations in: Pittsburgh, Erie, Johnstown, Ebensburg, and Altoona. All of our lawyers are licensed to practice law in the state of Pennsylvania. We also have attorneys licensed to practice law in the states of West Virginia, Ohio, Maryland, and Virginia. Although this website is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the states of Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, Maryland, and Virginia, if you are injured in an accident, we have relationships with other personal injury attorneys and lawyers throughout the United States.
Employee Login

600 Grant St, FL 10

Pittsburgh. PA 15219

2900 Plank Road Ste 4

Altoona. PA 16601

104 South Center Street

Ebensburg. PA 15931

5158 Peach Street #10

104 College Park Plaza

Johnstown. PA 15904

Be sure to take advantage of our complimentary and confidential legal consultation. We can answer your questions and determine if you have a case.

It’s FREE. It’s FAST. And, it’s EASY. Here are 3 ways to get your free consultation NOW:

Call now at 1-866-943-3427 – we’re available 24/7.

23 Years of Herpes Lawsuits – Do You Have to Tell You Have Herpes and When? #genital #herpes,herpes #celebrities,herpes #dating,herpes #laws,herpes #lawsuit,herpes #litigation,herpes #moral #issues,herpes #relationships,herpes #rules,herpes #telling,oral #herpes,std #laws,herpes #legal

23 Years of Herpes Lawsuits Do You Have to Tell You Have Herpes and When?

You CAN be sued for not telling someone you had herpes. 23 years of herpes lawsuits proves this.

Starting in 1987, Let’s Look Over 23 Years of Herpes Lawsuits

In 1987 Tony Bennett made headlines when he was ordered by the courts to undergo medical tests to determine if he could have given a woman genital herpes. Bennett said he didn’t have herpes and that his doctors report confirmed this. Her lawsuit was for $95 million and he, naturally, was counter suing for $100 million.

I can find many references to the filing of this case, and none to how it was eventfully settled .

Also in 1987, this was making headlines:

The decision upheld the right of Jane Maharam, 56, to sue her former husband Robert, 56, on her claim that he had herpes and did not tell her. The court found that such partners have a legal duty to inform each other about their venereal diseases.

1992 was another big year in herpes lawsuits:

One of the big news items was that a 1986 lawsuit filed again the actor/comedian Robin Williams was finally settled. That’s 6 years later after the herpes lawsuit was filed! The case was settled out of court for an “undisclosed sum.”

The 1992 article in The New York Times, “Pillow Talk ” brings up much that is still hotly being debated today:

1. Mr. Williams s lawyer, argued in court papers that a person who doesn t ask and doesn t insist on prophylactics should assume the risks.

2. So, legal experts have begun to ask whether the responsibility for taking precautions should be shared. Everybody should be on notice that unprotected sex creates risks of all sorts, and you shouldn t rely totally on the good-faith disclosure of a partner, said Catherine O Neill of the Legal Action Center.

3. He also noted that judges have not come right out and described what they would consider a legally acceptable way to break the bad news to a lover. They haven t exactly spelled out a kind of Miranda warning for these cases, Mr. Rabin said.

4. In herpes litigation, the claims against partners have ranged from those who sinned by omission, keeping mum about their status, to those who, when asked if they had a sexually transmitted disease, lied. In a 1984 opinion in a herpes case, a California appellate court acknowledged that while rulings on bedroom behavior infringed the right to privacy, public-health-policy concerns loomed larger. Courts have decided that if someone is infected, aware of it and sexually active, that person has a duty to inform a partner, who by extension, has a right to know.

2004 Herpes Lawsuits

In 2004 it was alleged NOT that Liza Minnelli had actually given David Gest herpes, but that Liza Minnelli had not told him that she had herpes until months after they had been married. Essentially, what was put forth was that this would make the prenuptial agreement invalid as the agreement would have been based on fraud… not all the information was given to Gest when signing the prenup.

2006 Herpes Lawsuit

Michael Vick, the football player who was later went to jail for dog-fighting and animal cruelty, settled a lawsuit filed by a woman who said he knowingly gave her herpes. The name “Ron Mexico” became infamous as that was the fake name Vick is reported to have used when seeking treatment for herpes.

2007 Herpes Lawsuit

In Los Angeles CA, Elizabeth Mazzocchi filed a herpes lawsuit against NYPD Blue actor Esai Morales. Once again, you only can find reference to the announcement of the lawsuit, and no reference to its outcome .

2009 Herpes Lawsuit

A woman was awarded $7 million in a suit filed by a 56 year old woman who was infected with herpes by a 77 year old man. Interesting here is the woman said she was denied health insurance after getting infected with herpes. The77 year old man said he would appeal.

2010 Herpes Lawsuit

A woman from Chicago filed a herpes lawsuit seeking $50,000 against her husband. The 1987 Tony Bennett lawsuit was for $95 million. Now, lawyers will take cases for $50,000. It seems it’s getting easier and easier to sue for herpes.

Where there is blood in the water, you are sure to find sharks. Lawyers seem to be more actively chasing the herpes ambulance.


• Is there a double standard for oral herpes and genital herpes? Is this fair?

• Should people have to disclose that they have oral herpes before kissing another person?

• Can you be sued for having HSV-1 (usually oral herpes) and having oral sex, and not telling the other person?

• If you give a person HSV-1 through oral sex can you be sued?

• Can you be sued for KISSING another person and giving them HSV-1 oral herpes?

• Do you have to tell that you have genital herpes if you practice safe sex and it’s a one night stand?

• If you are participating in RISKY BEHAVIOR, does that mean you assume the risk? (Could a prostitute sue someone for giving her herpes?)

• Do porn stars have a right to know if the person they are working with has herpes?

• Must you tell the truth of your STD status if the other person asks? In other words, “Is LYING the same as simply not telling?”

• Is the responsibility of discussing herpes and other STDs a one way street? Is only a person who knows they have or have had an STD required to bring it up?

• Is a person who has unprotected sex with lots of people required to be truthful about this when asked? After all, it’s the risky behavior that makes a STD more likely. People that get tested are simply being responsible. Must the responsible people bear all the responsibility simply because they got tested?

• Does a person have a LEGAL responsibility to know their STD status? If a person is having unprotected sex with multiple partners, shouldn’t they know that they may be passing on STDs to other people, even if they haven’t received an official test? A reasonable person would know this.

• Is a person who has a STD but fails to get tested still legally responsible for giving the other person their STD? (The ignorance is bliss excuse is an excuse…)

• Is HSV-1 a sexually transmitted disease?